Ras-related protein Rap-1A (RAP1A)

The protein contains 184 amino acids for an estimated molecular weight of 20987 Da.

 

Induces morphological reversion of a cell line transformed by a Ras oncogene. Counteracts the mitogenic function of Ras, at least partly because it can interact with Ras GAPs and RAF in a competitive manner. Together with ITGB1BP1, regulates KRIT1 localization to microtubules and membranes. Plays a role in nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced neurite outgrowth. Plays a role in the regulation of embryonic blood vessel formation. Involved in the establishment of basal endothelial barrier function. May be involved in the regulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor KDR expression at endothelial cell-cell junctions. (updated: April 1, 2015)

Protein identification was indicated in the following studies:

  1. Goodman and co-workers. (2013) The proteomics and interactomics of human erythrocytes. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 238(5), 509-518.
  2. Lange and co-workers. (2014) Annotating N termini for the human proteome project: N termini and Nα-acetylation status differentiate stable cleaved protein species from degradation remnants in the human erythrocyte proteome. J Proteome Res. 13(4), 2028-2044.
  3. Hegedűs and co-workers. (2015) Inconsistencies in the red blood cell membrane proteome analysis: generation of a database for research and diagnostic applications. Database (Oxford) 1-8.
  4. Wilson and co-workers. (2016) Comparison of the Proteome of Adult and Cord Erythroid Cells, and Changes in the Proteome Following Reticulocyte Maturation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 15(6), 1938-1946.
  5. Bryk and co-workers. (2017) Quantitative Analysis of Human Red Blood Cell Proteome. J Proteome Res. 16(8), 2752-2761.
  6. D'Alessandro and co-workers. (2017) Red blood cell proteomics update: is there more to discover? Blood Transfus. 15(2), 182-187.
  7. Chu and co-workers. (2018) Quantitative mass spectrometry of human reticulocytes reveal proteome-wide modifications during maturation. Br J Haematol. 180(1), 118-133.

Methods

The following articles were analysed to gather the proteome content of erythrocytes.

The gene or protein list provided in the studies were processed using the ID mapping API of Uniprot in September 2018. The number of proteins identified and mapped without ambiguity in these studies is indicated below.
Only Swiss-Prot entries (reviewed) were considered for protein evidence assignation.

PublicationIdentification 1Uniprot mapping 2Not mapped /
Obsolete
TrEMBLSwiss-Prot
Goodman (2013)2289 (gene list)227853205992269
Lange (2014)123412347281224
Hegedus (2015)2638262202352387
Wilson (2016)165815281702911068
d'Alessandro (2017)18261817201815
Bryk (2017)20902060101081942
Chu (2018)18531804553621387

1 as available in the article and/or in supplementary material
2 uniprot mapping returns all protein isoforms as one entry

The compilation of older studies can be retrieved from the Red Blood Cell Collection database.

The data and differentiation stages presented below come from the proteomic study and analysis performed by our partners of the GReX consortium, more details are available in their published work.

No sequence conservation computed yet.

This protein is annotated as membranous in Gene Ontology, is annotated as membranous in UniProt.


Interpro domains
Total structural coverage: 100%
Model score: 0
No model available.

(right-click above to access to more options from the contextual menu)

The reference OMIM entry for this protein is 179520

Ras-related protein 1a; rap1a krev1

CLONING

Rousseau-Merck et al. (1990) stated that 3 human cDNAs encoding 'new' RAS-related proteins, designated RAP1A, RAP1B (179530), and RAP2 (179540), were isolated by Pizon et al. (1988) and Pizon et al. (1988). These proteins share approximately 50% amino acid identity with the classical RAS proteins and have numerous structural features in common. The most striking difference between the RAP and RAS proteins resides in their 61st amino acid: glutamine in RAS is replaced by threonine in RAP proteins. Kitayama et al. (1989) isolated a human cDNA termed Krev1 that can suppress the transformed phenotype of a Kirsten transformed cell line. The predicted amino acid sequence of the Krev1 protein is identical to that of RAP1A.

GENE FUNCTION

Boussiotis et al. (1997) noted that C3G (600303) catalyzes GTP exchange of Rap1. Immunoblot analysis showed that in anergic T cells, CBL (165360) is constitutively phosphorylated, CRKL (602007)-C3G complexes are recruited, and Rap1, an antagonist of Ras function and a negative regulator of IL2 transcription, is activated. Boussiotis et al. (1997) suggested that the key determinant of the functional outcome of T cell receptor-initiated signals may be the ratio of Ras-GTP to RAP1-GTP, with the predominance of the former enhancing, and the of the latter blocking, IL2 transcription. Asha et al. (1999) demonstrated that RAS1-mediated signaling pathways in Drosophila are not influenced by RAP1 levels, suggesting that RAS1 and RAP1 function via distinct pathways. Moreover, a mutation that abolishes the putative cAMP-dependent kinase phosphorylation site of Drosophila RAP1 can still rescue the RAP1 mutant phenotype. Asha et al. (1999) demonstrated that RAP1 is not needed for cell proliferation and cell-fate specification but has a critical function in regulating normal morphogenesis in the eye disc, the ovary, and the embryo. RAP1 mutations also disrupt cell migrations and cause abnormalities in cell shape. These findings indicate a role for RAP proteins as regulators of morphogenesis in vivo. Mochizuki et al. (2001) used fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based sensors to evaluate the spatiotemporal images of growth factor-induced activation of RAS and RAP1. Epidermal growth factor (131530) activated RAS at the peripheral plasma membrane and RAP1 at the intracellular perinuclear region of COS-1 cells. In PC12 cells, nerve growth factor (see 162030)-induced activation of RAS was initiated at the plasma membrane and transmitted to the whole cell body. After 3 hours, high RAS activity was observed at the extending neurites. By using the FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) technique, Mochizuki et al. (2001) found that RAS at the neurites turned over rapidly; therefore, the sustained RAS activity at neurites was due to high GTP/GDP exchange rate and/or low GTPase activity, but not to the retention of the active RAS. While previous biochemical analyses rarely detected more than 40% activation of RAS upon growth factor stimulation, Mochizuki et al. (2001) concluded that their data show that growth factor stimulation strongly activates RAS/RAP1 in a very restricted area within cells, and that a large population of RAS or RAP1 remains inactive, causing an apparent low-level response in biochemical assays. Zhu et al. (2002) examined the small GTPases RAS and RAP in the postsynaptic signaling underlying synaptic plasticity. They showed that RAS relays the NMDA receptor (see 1 ... More on the omim web site

Subscribe to this protein entry history

Feb. 2, 2018: Protein entry updated
Automatic update: Uniprot description updated

Dec. 19, 2017: Protein entry updated
Automatic update: Uniprot description updated

March 16, 2016: Protein entry updated
Automatic update: OMIM entry 179520 was added.